Political Identity and the Distinctiveness of Religious Freedom
Yale Law School
The position that religious freedom is a distinct right is typically based on an idea of the singularity of religion. It is, the argument goes, an especially demanding form of normative belief, or a form of culture that penetrates more deeply than others into the human psyche. These distinct attributes make it necessary to accommodate and protect religious adherents above the regular rights and protections offered to every citizen.
Abiri argues first, negatively, that these accounts of the distinctiveness of religion fall short of their target. Second, positively, he argues that it is not religion’s unique attributes that make it worthy of protection, but the fact that it fulfills similar social and political functions to the central legitimizing ideology of the modern state: nationality. This functional conflict makes religion especially vulnerable to the unifying pressures of state nationalism, a situation that warrants the special treatment it so often gets.