Democracy Paradox Podcast
About the Episode:

This episode begins with host Justin Kempf and Javier Pérez Sandoval setting the stage for a deep dive into the “regime question,” highlighting its significance in democratic theory and contemporary politics. Their introductory discussion explores foundational divides in political systems and frames the questions that will be pursued, particularly the tensions between institutional arrangements and party cleavages. The heart of the episode follows as Kempf interviews Amel Ahmed, who draws on her comparative research to examine historical battles over parliamentary power, suffrage, and executive authority in the United Kingdom, United States, and Germany. Ahmed connects these cases to present-day concerns about legislative dysfunction and polarization, demonstrating that ongoing contestation over the rules of democracy is both persistent and essential to democratic governance.

Full Transcript

Show Notes:

The episode opens with host Justin Kempf introducing guest Javier Pérez Sandoval, a postdoctoral associate at the Kellogg Institute, to preview the conversation with Amel Ahmed about the enduring “regime question” in democratic systems. Javier discusses the concept’s roots in classic political science literature – how foundational conflicts in society shape party systems – and explains Ahmed’s innovative focus on institutional preferences as a separate dimension of contestation beyond standard ideological divides. The dialogue sets up why the regime question, centered on the normative debate over “how we should govern ourselves,” matters for both historical analysis and today’s democratic debates.

Transitioning to Amel Ahmed herself, the interview explores her research and the themes of her book, The Regime Question: Foundations of Democratic Governance in Europe and the United States (Princeton University Press, 2025). Early sections dive into the first wave of democracy, focusing on the centrality of parliamentarianism and the contest between legislatures and executives, with special attention to the historical struggle between parliaments and the crown in the UK. Ahmed clarifies how the UK achieved stable parliamentarianism by sequencing reforms – gradually eroding monarchical power and steadily empowering parliamentary rule, with reforms in 1832, 1867, and 1884 marking key turning points.

The conversation then shifts to case studies: France, the United States, and Germany. Ahmed details how the United States represents “unsettled parliamentarianism,” where aristocratic power – especially around slavery – divided the democratic element of house representation and contributed to persistent regime disputes. Germany’s experience is contrasted, highlighting how mass suffrage without strong parliamentarian institutions led to destabilizing governance, legislative failure, and eventual executive overreach. The discussion draws parallels to contemporary authoritarian regimes and electoral processes, showing how elections alone are insufficient for democracy if legislatures lack real power.

From there, Ahmed elaborates on pervasive legislative dysfunction, both historically and in the current era, explaining that failures to govern often precede executive aggrandizement and democratic backsliding. She notes that moments of intense polarization over regime rules – seen today in the US and Europe – echo historic battles, and warns that when regime questions become salient, compromise is much harder to achieve, fundamentally disrupting traditional political coalitions.

The episode concludes by reflecting on what today’s regime question looks like. Ahmed argues that contemporary democratic fights are not about democracy versus autocracy, but about competing visions for representative institutions – all framed in the language of democracy. She urges listeners to recognize that contestation over democratic rules is a normal, if turbulent, part of democratic governance. Ahmed invites citizens to actively participate in these foundational debates, reminding listeners that political stability is the exception and that negotiating the basic contours of democracy is an ongoing generational project.

 

Links:
Listen: